A few software tools can help editors of online magazines to check for the originality of reports, and in this capacity tools such as Copyscape are ideal. They allow an editor to ascertain if the article use has been copied or possibly not and if so to what amount. The tools are wonderful for the.
If you think your family members are not proficient enough to help you tackle your writing, then you definately should consider using the services of professional academic proofreaders and additionally editors. Proofreaders check for glitches, and may not comment on this of your work. They may not even comment on the amount of padding it contains. That being so you may want to hire the services associated with a proofreader-editor who will comment on superfluous pieces of text and give tips as to how your work may be improved.
It happens to be fine to use formatting equipment and spell checks, but if you are writing academic English, it is likely that a grammar reading tool will not know how to deal with such writing, as it is not natural language or at a minimum not the natural terminology the software tool has been programmed to accept as correct.
Paraphrasing tools are also superior if you are a creative writer jammed for a synonym, but are not so good if you want to change a substantial body of text in addition to want a tool to paraphrase it. The end results are usually non-sensical to readers. Writers whom do this kind of thing can have an original text, but no one wants to read it.
For academic writing, especially dissertations and PhD theses, you need a human proofreader-editor to check work rather than a software tool. If you have someone whose written English provides great improvements over yours, then ask them to go through your work and make the info changes to grammar and spelling. You have to have consistent spelling, either US or United kingdom English except for quotations because you cannot change the transliteration in these.
You can ask the editor to simply switch what is necessary or ask for comments only. A good publisher will be knowledgeable about the arena you are writing in and will also be able to check for plagiarism as sometimes it is obvious on the trained eye, as the published language changes when you use another person’s words. A software tool could possibly not be able to pick up on such changes to your written fashion.
Of course it is best not to plagiarize, but sometimes this is accomplished inadvertently, as there is nothing more simple than paraphrasing. Citing an author and giving credit standing for his/her work should be done as a matter not surprisingly. A good proofreader editor is way better than a software tool for tidying up and preparing ones own written work before it is submitted.